Sample App

Selected for [use case] because of [supported advantage]. The main tradeoff is [material limitation].

Why this pick Application profile

Fit

Who this recommendation is for

Use case[Player need]

Game or format[Verified format]

Time context[Relevant UTC window]

Selection

Why it was selected

This pair leads for [use case] on [supported criteria]. Club identifiers, source rows, and commercial relationships cannot create or improve a recommendation.

Evidence

What supports the pick

DPH observedClaim or observation, test context, and reproducible methodChecked · UTC
Official claimAttributed operator, application, or club statementVerified · UTC
UnknownMaterial fact that could not be verified and how it limits the recommendationUnresolved

Risks and uncertainty

What could change the decision

Application risk

[Availability, version, product-model, or operator limitation]

Club risk

[Identity, access, settlement, contact, or relationship limitation]

Alternatives

Why alternatives were not selected

[Alternative] trails on [criterion] because [supported reason].

Revision

Correction status

No correction published.

A corrected record shows what changed, why, when, the supporting evidence, and the preserved prior version.

Status previews

Every publication state is explicit.

Only one state appears on the canonical route at a time.

No current pick

No approved recommendation is active

Do not retain, infer, or substitute an expired club or application. Link to the directory and history.

Scheduled

The next pick is not public yet

Do not reveal the recommendation before its CMS effective time. Show the no-current state until activation.

Expired

The publication window ended

Remove the active recommendation from this route and preserve it in history with its original UTC window.

Corrected

The active record changed

Display the correction note and current facts while preserving the previous revision in history.